On March 25, 2017, Utah became the first state to
enact the Uniform Commercial Real Estate Receivership Act (UCRERA), which
was drafted by the National Conference of Commissioners (hereinafter,
“National Conference”) on Uniform State Laws and adopted at its annual
meeting in July 2015. At least four other state legislatures (Nevada,
Oklahoma, Michigan and Maryland) are currently considering adopting UCRERA.
Other state legislatures are likely to follow.1
This article provides bankruptcy/ receivership professionals with a brief
introduction to this uniform law.
Background
A few years ago, the National Conference appointed
a distinguished committee, chaired by Thomas S. Hemmendinger
(Brennan, Recupero, et al.; Providence, R.I.), to study and draft a
uniform state law governing the administration of commercial real estate
receiverships. The National Conference saw a need for such a law because
very few states have any comprehensive statutory guidance regarding the
appointment and powers of commercial real estate receivers. Presently,
receivership law essentially is made by judges on a case-by-case basis.
Without a uniform statute, every receivership case is unique, and in every
such case, there are lingering questions about whether a broad appointment
order from a court of equity can override other state laws governing
liens, debt-collection remedies and foreclosure procedures.
Summary of Key Statutory Provisions in the Utah
Act
What follows is a brief summary of UCRERA’s
key provisions. Practitioners are urged to read the statute carefully for
a more comprehensive understanding of the proposed legislation. Moreover,
the National Conference report on UCRERA contains comments and examples
that are helpful in applying the specific provisions of the statute.
Definitions
In general, the definitions in UCRERA are similar
to definitions for similar terms found in the Bankruptcy Code and Uniform
Commercial Code. However, some defined terms have no corresponding
definitions in the Bankruptcy Code, whereas other important terms in the
law are intentionally undefined to allow for situational flexibility.
Notice and Opportunity for Hearing
Many of the concepts in UCRERA will be familiar to
bankruptcy/receivership professionals. For example, under UCRERA, the
court may enter orders only after such notice and opportunity for a
hearing as is appropriate under the circumstances, and it might issue an
order without an actual hearing if no interested party timely requests a
hearing or if the particular circumstances require an order before a
hearing can be held.
Scope and Exclusions
UCRERA applies to all receiverships for real
property, as well as related personal property, except where
the real property is improved by one to four “dwelling units,” unless the
dwelling units are used as part of a commercial enterprise. The
legislation does not apply to a receivership authorized by the laws
of state where the receiver is a governmental unit or an individual acting
in an official capacity on behalf of the governmental unit. The statute
also can be supplemented by general principles of law and equity.
Power of the Court
The trial courts of the applicable state have
exclusive jurisdiction of receivership proceedings brought under the
statute. With regard to venue, however, other provisions of state law will
govern.
Appointment
UCRERA establishes standards under which a court
may appoint a receiver in the exercise of its equitable discretion. These
standards, which are specified in the statute, include circumstances both
before and after the judgment. In addition, the statute contains broad
authority to appoint a receiver “on equitable grounds.” It also allows for
an appointment “during the time allowed for redemption to preserve a
property sold in an execution or foreclosure sale” and to secure the rents
during such time. UCRERA further establishes standards under which a
petitioning mortgage lienholder is entitled to the appointment of a
receiver. Where the court appoints a receiver on an ex parte basis, the
court may also require the party seeking an appointment to post security
for any damages, attorneys’ fees and costs incurred by a person injured if
the appointment is later determined to have been unjustified.
Identity and Independence of Receiver
The statute requires that the receiver be
independent and disinterested. However, certain types of specified
relationships do not disqualify a receiver. Furthermore, while a party
seeking an appointment of a receiver may nominate someone, the court is
not bound by any such nomination.
Receiver’s Bond
Every receiver must post a bond that is
conditioned on the faithful discharge of the receiver’s duties in an
amount specified by the court, and that is effective upon appointment.
Where required by the circumstances, the court may authorize the receiver
to act before the bond is posted. The statute does not authorize the court
to waive the bond requirement, although the court may approve alternative
forms of security, such as letters of credit or a deposit of funds.
Receivership property, however, may not be used as security.
Effect of Appointment; Receiver as Lien
Creditor
On appointment, and with respect to personal
property, a receiver has the status and priority of a lien creditor under
chapter 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code. With respect to real property, a
receiver has a similar status under the state’s applicable recording
statute.
Effect on After-Acquired Property
The appointment of a receiver does not affect the
validity of a pre-receivership security interest in receivership property.
Any property acquired by the receiver after the appointment is subject to
any pre-receivership security agreement to the same extent as if no
receiver had been appointed.
Collection and Turnover of Receivership
Property
On appointment, persons having possession, custody
or control of receivership property must turn over the property to the
receiver, and persons owing debts that constitute receivership property
must pay those debts to the receiver. A person with notice of the
receivership and who owes a debt that is receivership property may not
satisfy the debt by paying the owner. The court also may sanction a
person’s failure to turn over property when required, unless there is a
bona fide dispute or setoff regarding the property.
Powers and Duties of the Receiver
UCRERA grants very broad presumptive powers to the
receiver. In addition, a receiver may exercise certain powers only with
court approval, such as transferring property outside the ordinary
course of business. Furthermore, the statute sets forth the receiver’s
performance and reporting duties.
Duties of Owner
The statute places the duties of assistance,
cooperation and turnover on owners of a receivership property. If the
owner is not an “individual,” then these duties apply to each officer,
director, manager, member, partner, trustee or other person exercising or
having the power to exercise control over the affairs of the owner. A
knowing failure of a person to perform these duties can subject the
person to the payment of actual damages, including reasonable attorneys’
fees, costs and civil contempt sanctions.
Automatic Stay; Injunctions
Entry of the order of appointment imposes a stay,
applicable to all persons, of any action to obtain possession of, exercise
control over or enforce a judgment against receivership property. In the
appropriate situations, the court can expand the scope of the stay and
also grant relief from the stay. For policy reasons, certain actions are
excluded from this stay, including actions to foreclose or enforce a
mortgage by the person seeking the appointment of the receiver and police
power actions by governmental units. The court may void an action that
violates this stay. The statute also addresses the consequences of a
violation of the stay and allows a court to award actual damages caused by
the violation, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs and civil
contempt sanctions.
Engagement and Compensation of Professionals
UCRERA authorizes the receiver to engage and pay
professionals. A professional is not disqualified from being hired solely
because of the person’s engagement by, representation of or other
relationship with the receiver, a creditor or a party. In addition, the
statute does not prevent the receiver from serving as an attorney,
accountant, auctioneer or broker “when authorized by law.” Both receivers
and their retained professionals must file itemized statements of their
work and can only be paid upon court approval.
Use, Sale, Lease, License or Other Transfer of
Receivership Property Other Than in the Ordinary Course
With court approval, the legislation permits the
receiver to use, sell, lease, license, exchange or transfer receivership
property other than in the ordinary course of business. Unless the
agreement of transfer provides otherwise, the transfer is free and clear
of a lien of the person that obtained appointment of the receiver, any
subordinate lien and any rights of redemption, but such a sale is subject
to liens that are senior to the lien of the person who obtained the
receiver’s appointment. Liens extinguished by the receiver’s sale attach
to proceeds with the same validity, perfection and priority as they had
with respect to the property sold, even if the proceeds are not sufficient
to satisfy all obligations secured by the liens. The sale could be
conducted as either a public auction or a private sale.
Creditors with valid secured claims may credit
bid, but only if the creditor tenders funds sufficient to satisfy (in
full) the reasonable expenses of transfer and the obligations secured by
any senior liens extinguished by the transfer. For example, Senior
Mortgage Creditor A holds a secured claim with an unpaid balance of $3
million, Junior Mortgage Creditor B holds a secured claim with an unpaid
balance of $1 million, and there is a superior tax lien for unpaid real
property taxes of $100,000. Creditor B obtains the appointment of a
receiver and the court authorizes the receiver to conduct an auction sale
of the property. Creditor A does not consent to the sale and under
applicable law may refuse prepayment of the senior debt. Any sale by the
receiver will be subject to Creditor A’s lien and the tax lien. However,
Creditor B may credit bid at the sale up to the full amount of its $1
million in debt, and, if it is the highest bidder, may acquire the title
to the real estate, free of all junior and subordinate liens, so long as
Creditor B also tenders sufficient funds equal to the costs of the sale.
The statute also provides a safe harbor for good-faith purchasers in case
a party objects but fails to obtain a stay.
Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases
With court approval, a receiver may adopt or
reject an executory contract of the owner that relates to the receivership
property. If, under applicable state law, the owner could assign the
contract, then the receiver may also assign the contract with court
approval. Performance of a contract by a receiver prior to its adoption is
not an implied adoption of the contract, nor does it preclude a subsequent
rejection. UCRERA specifies the mechanics for adoption, assignment or
rejection of executory contracts, and the resulting consequences.
A provision in a contract that requires or permits
a forfeiture, modification or termination of the contract because of
either a receiver’s appointment or the owner’s financial condition does
not affect a receiver’s power to adopt the executory contract. The
legislation also contains protections for purchasers in possession of real
property or real property timeshare interests that are analogous to those
contained in the Bankruptcy Code. Finally, the statute limits the
receiver’s ability to reject the unexpired lease of a tenant, permitting
rejection of the lease only in very limited situations.
Immunity of the Receiver
Consistent with the receiver’s status as an
officer of the court, the statute expressly provides the receiver with
immunity for acts or omissions within the scope of the receiver’s
appointment. As such, UCRERA incorporates the Barton doctrine.2
Claims
UCRERA requires the receiver to notify “creditors
of the owner” of a receiver’s appointment, unless the court orders
otherwise. The statute prescribes the notice’s content and the manner in
which it must be given, as well as specifies the manner in which claims
must be filed. The statute states what information must be included with a
claim and permits the receiver to recommend disallowance of claims. The
court may forgo the filing of unsecured claims where the receivership
property is likely to be insufficient to satisfy secured claims.
Receiver’s Reports and Discharge
The receiver may file and, if ordered by the
court, must file interim reports that contain certain specified
information. Upon completion of the receiver’s duties, the receiver also
must file a final report that contains certain prescribed information.
Once the court approves the receiver’s final report and the receiver has
distributed all of the receivership property, the receiver has been
discharged.
Receiver’s Fees and Expenses
The court may award a reasonable fee to the
receiver from receivership property. In addition, the court may order the
person who requested the appointment to pay such fees if the receivership
does not produce sufficient funds to pay them. The court may also order
payment of the receiver’s fees and expenses from a person whose conduct
justified or would have justified the receiver’s appointment. Removal or
Replacement of Receiver; Termination The court may remove a receiver “for
cause” and replace a receiver who dies, resigns or is removed. The statute
does not define “cause,” but leaves the determination to the courts on a
case-by-case basis. The court may also discharge a receiver and terminate
administration of receivership property if it finds that the appointment
was “improvident” or that the circumstances no longer warrant the
receivership’s continuation. Moreover, if the court finds that the
appointment was sought “wrongfully or in bad faith,” the court may assess
fees, expenses and actual damages, including reasonable attorneys’ fees
and costs, against the person who sought the appointment.
Ancillary Receivership
Where a receiver has been appointed by another
state, the statute authorizes the court to appoint that person or its
designee as an ancillary receiver for the purposes of obtaining
possession, custody and control of receivership property located within
the state. Once an ancillary receiver has been appointed, that receiver
has all of the rights, powers and duties of an original receiver appointed
under the statute, unless the court orders otherwise.
Receivership in the Context of Mortgage
Enforcement; Anti-Deficiency Rules
UCRERA makes it clear that a receiver’s
appointment on request of a mortgagee or assignee of rents does not make
the mortgagee or assignee a “mortgagee in possession,” and does not (1)
constitute an election of remedies, (2) make the secured obligation
unenforceable or (3) constitute an “action” within the meaning of any
applicable “one-action” rule. Where a receiver conducts a sale of
receivership property free and clear of a lien, the state’s
anti-deficiency rules will apply to any extinguished lien to the same
extent that those rules would have applied following a foreclosure sale
not governed by the statute.
Conclusion
UCRERA vastly improves the administration of
commercial real estate receiverships. It provides judges, practitioners
and participants with a more procedural structure and predictability than
what currently exists in most states. While the statute is not a
replacement for liquidations or reorganizations of commercial real estate
properties under the Bankruptcy Code and cannot modify 11 U.S.C. § 543, it
does provide secured creditors with another option for managing and
liquidating their distressed commercial real property collateral.
Reprinted with permission from the ABI Journal, Vol. XXXVI, No. 7, July
2017. The American Bankruptcy Institute is a multi-disciplinary,
nonpartisan organization devoted to bankruptcy issues. ABI has more than
12,000 members, representing all facets of the insolvency field. For more
information, visit abi.org.
1 To review UCRERA and track its
legislative progress, visit uniformlaws.org/Act.
2 See Barton v. Barbour, 104 U.S. 126,
129, 26 L. Ed. 672 (1881)
*David Leta is a partner with Snell and Wilmer LLP in Salt Lake
City. For more than 40 years, he has represented debtors, creditors,
trustees, creditors’ committees, asset purchasers, vendors, equity holders
and other parties in financial disputes.
|