Publisher’s Note: Judge Sheri Bluebond consented to be
interviewed for the Receivership News’ issue that coincides with the 2019
Annual California Bankruptcy Forum Conference scheduled for mid-May in
Rancho Mirage. Special thanks to insolvency lawyer extraordinaire Bill
Lobel (Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP), patriarch of today’s CBF
conference, for facilitating the interview. Bob Mosier, Publisher,
Receivership News Veteran Bankruptcy Judge Bluebond is just
completing a four-year term as Chief Judge of the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the Central District of California with five locations –
Downtown Los Angeles, Santa Ana, Santa Barbara, Woodland Hills and
Riverside. This Central District serves a population of more than 19
million people spread out over seven counties – Los Angeles, Orange, Santa
Barbara, Ventura, San Luis Obispo, Riverside and San Bernardino. Another
project Judge Bluebond recently completed is a one-year term as Chair of
the Ninth Circuit’s Conference of Chief Bankruptcy Judges (aka “Chief of
the Chiefs”). This article will initially focus on Judge Bluebond’s role
as Chief Judge and Chief of the Chiefs followed by a more general
discussion of her role as a Bankruptcy Judge at the Edward R. Roybal
Federal Building in Downtown LA, including how she got there. Finally, we
are pleased to present a glimpse into Judge Bluebond’s personal life.
To Judge Bluebond, the four-year term as Chief Judge has been a great
experience. The concentration of the Chief Judge is largely administrative
and deals with everything from personnel issues to budgets and facilities.
Judge Bluebond had the challenge of representing the interests of the
Bankruptcy Court in connection with the remodeling of the Roybal Building
to accommodate the addition of the Los Angeles-based Federal Magistrate
Judges and assorted district court clerk’s office staff into a building
already occupied by the Bankruptcy Court’s Los Angeles division. Planning
and construction of the project took years, but, now that the dust has
settled, Judge Bluebond perceives that all tenants seems happy in their
newly-remodeled space. As a result, the two different types of Article I
judges (Bankruptcy Judges and Magistrate Judges) are strengthening their
ties with one another and enjoying their increased camaraderie. (Will
select Magistrate Judges be available to mediate bankruptcy disputes?)
According to Judge Bluebond, administrative decision-making at the
court is done largely through a comprehensive committee structure. The
Chief Judge assigns judges to various court committees, chairs the Court’s
executive committee and its quarterly board of judges’ meetings, and
attends all of the committees’ meetings to ensure that the committees are
functioning properly and that their interactions are coordinated. Are
there enough hours in a day? Another aspect of being Chief Judge is
interfacing with the Judicial Council for the Ninth Circuit and the
National Judicial Conference’s Committee on the Administration of the
Bankruptcy System with regard to such issues as the number of judges,
temporary judgeships, and filling vacancies. At the height of the subprime
meltdown, when bankruptcy filings in the Central District peaked at more
than 143,000 for the year, Congress created three temporary judgeships for
the Central District. Once these new judgeships were filled – a process
which can take approximately 18 months – there were 24 active bankruptcy
judges sitting in the Central District.
As these new judgeships were temporary, the first three positions that
become open after the “lapse date” of May 25, 2017 are to be discontinued.
Therefore, as Judges Peter Carroll and Meredith Jury retired
from the district after this date, two of the district’s three temporary
positions have lapsed. Judges Thomas Donovan and Richard Neiter
also retired, but they did so before the lapse date. Therefore, although
their positions have not been filled due to decreased filings in the
district – the Court finished 2018 with a total of 37,208 filings or 27%
of the 2009 high water mark – these positions remain open and available to
be filled once filings in the district increase. As a result of these
retirements, the district currently has 20 active bankruptcy judges and 5
retired judges serving on recall, which, at present, is sufficient to
handle the workload in the district.
In light of budgetary constraints and heightened interest at both the
circuit and national level in cost containment efforts, and during Judge
Bluebond’s tenure, the Court made significant strides in its efforts to
increase the level of shared administrative services between the
Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California and various other
court units and federal agencies throughout the country. Over the course
of the past few years, the Court has provided its expertise to other
courts and agencies in such areas as space planning, building maintenance,
IT support, furniture moving, fleet liaison services, web design,
training, audit preparation, programming and software design. This Central
District has emerged as a leader in this field by offering more services
than most other courts.
Another question posed to Judge Bluebond: Has the Central District
taken any steps in an effort to attract some of the larger cases currently
being filed elsewhere in the country? Judge Bluebond explained that it has
been difficult to obtain a consensus among the Central District judges
whether to it would be desirable or appropriate to take such steps as the
establishment of a specialized panel for complex chapter 11 cases.
Instead, the Court has focused its efforts on streamlining and improving
chapter 11 procedures district-wide for all judges, first through the
adoption of General Order 05-05, which was later incorporated into the
Local Rules, and later by encouraging judges to comply with local rules
designed to facilitate the scheduling of first day and other emergency
motions. To date, Judge Bluebond reports that not much progress has been
made toward turning the Central District of California into the next
Delaware or Southern District of New York. (Judge Bluebond opined that the
only viable mechanism for reversing this eastward trend is likely to be a
change in the venue statute.) Nevertheless, Judge Bluebond reports that,
although the number of filings under chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code
continued to decrease during the 2017/18 period, the number of chapter 11
filings actually increased in the district by 15.4 percent during the same
period.
Judge Bluebond identified the following as one of her greatest
accomplishments as Chief Judge: During her term as Chief, the Bankruptcy
Court underwent two cyclical audits by the Administrative Office of the
United States Courts and emerged from each without a single adverse
finding. This is a remarkable achievement for any court, let alone for a
court the size of the Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of
California. When asked at the beginning of her tenure as Chief Judge what
she hoped to accomplish during her term as Chief, Judge Bluebond responded
that she thought things had been running fairly nicely in the district and
that her main objective would be not to “screw things up.” The consensus
appears to be that she achieved that objective. But was there ever any
doubt?
Enough of Chief Judge (but the author concludes that a giant
“Congratulations” is in order), let’s turn our attention to Sheri
Bluebond’s role as a Bankruptcy Judge. This requires a little traditional
background information. She is a Los Angeles native with two degrees from
UCLA: a bachelor’s degree, summa cum laude; and a JD, where she graduated
1st in her class and was elected to the Order of the Coif. With this
impressive background, her work experience involves some of the area’s top
insolvency firms. She started her career as a summer associate and then
junior associate after graduation in 1985 at Gendel, Raskoff, Shapiro and
Quittner. When the Gendel firm dissolved in 1991, she was part of the
group that formed the Los Angeles office of what was then San Francisco’s
premier bankruptcy boutique, Murphy, Weir & Butler. In 1995, she left the
Murphy firm to chair the Creditors’ Rights and Insolvency Group at Irell &
Manella LLP.
When Lisa Hill Fenning decided to retire from the bankruptcy bench in
2000, Judge Bluebond threw her hat into a crowded ring with 47 other
applicants for the open position, understandably with low expectations
(there were more candidates for this Bankruptcy Judge opening than are
currently running for the Democratic nomination for President – and that
is a lot). But, as you might have guessed based on her pedigree, she got
the gig. She was reappointed to a second 14-year term in 2015. Among her
more high-profile cases, Judge Bluebond recalled a chapter 11 case that
she inherited when Kathleen March left the bench: Daewoo Motor
America. The case involved, among other things, comity issues arising out
of the Korean reorganization proceeding of the debtor’s parent company and
hotly-contested litigation between the debtor and its parent in which the
debtor attempted (unsuccessfully) to recharacterize a portion of its
intercompany debt as an equity infusion. Other particularly memorable
cases include two separate mass-tort asbestos cases that produced a wealth
of appeals. Another was the chapter 7 liquidation of the holding company
for Indymac Bank, in which she was called upon to interpret a tax-sharing
agreement in order to determine whether the debtor or the FDIC would
receive a multi-million-dollar tax refund. (The debtor, and its stalwart
chapter 7 trustee, Alfred Siegel, emerged victorious in that one.)
Well, finally, it is time to focus on the third area of this interview
– the personal side of Judge Bluebond. Recalling that Judge Bluebond
became a Judge in 2001, she got married in 2003. When asked about her
greatest accomplishment to date (professional or personal), she responded:
giving birth to twins with the help of an entire team of doctors and
donors in 2005. Her twins are now age 13. Most of us know Judge Bluebond
for her enthusiastic, high energy skills as a moderator/master of ceremony
at Bankruptcy Forum events. She admits that she enjoys it. What about
short-term personal goals? More sleep; less business travel; more personal
travel; and more singing. (Second only to her role as master of ceremony,
we have all been treated to the musical prowess of this singing judge, who
spent her high school days in the performing arts department at El Camino
Real High School in Woodland Hills and worked after school and weekends as
a song leader at camps and synagogues.)
Any interview with Judge Bluebond would not be complete without a bonus
section, so here you go. Does she like receivers? (After all, this is the
Receivership News). More on point, will she allow a receiver to
remain in charge of an asset or company if the conditions warrant it?
Well, it turns out that she absolutely loves one receiver – her husband
Brad Smith – and she reports that she has granted relief under Bankruptcy
Code § 543(d) and permitted receivers to retain possession of estate
assets on multiple occasions. This undoubtedly makes Judge Bluebond one of
the smartest and most accomplished judges since formation of the
Bankruptcy Act in 1800. Congratulations Judge Bluebond and we are looking
forward to at least another 25 years (her remaining current term and the
next).
*Robert P. Mosier
is a Southern California receiver and trustee and principal of Mosier & Company, Inc., a firm that has specialized in managing and turning around troubled companies and real estate projects for more than 35 years.
|